Foreclosure defense for fraudulent foreclosure

In the past, there has always been some good protection from revelations. However, in the aftermath of the catastrophe and the economic downturn, many homeowners have refused to fulfill the fruits of the prophecy. The reason for the increase in the number of successful mortgages is largely due to the overwhelming evidence available that the business mortgage is full of errors. Because of this testimony, the moment the court found the ball was in disarray, the sympathy for the landlords changed. Homeowners and attorneys can take advantage of this change in court behavior to challenge the enforcement of their conduct in a variety of ways. Some common measures for violence:

  • Insurance banks did not follow the required government procedures
  • The obligated party cannot prove that it is the owner of the loan (there is no “stand”)
  • The mortgage officer made a serious mistake while working on the loan
  • You are active in the service and are protected by the Civil Servants Act
  • Restriction law passed,
  • The employee used a confirmation or declaration.

Here are these protections and other details and how to bring them to court:

General foreclosure defense

A Pilgrimage lawyer can usually offer one or more types of defense. Below is a description of some common Pilgrimage protections.

Foreclosure bank does not follow state procedures.

Each state has specific procedures for seizures. In some cases, foreclosure banks do not comply with state procedural requirements for filing foreclosure claims. In this scenario, you can refuse Hajj. If your call is successful, the court will issue an order asking the foreclosure bank to restart. Note, however, that almost all judges will ignore an inconclusive error, such as the misspelling of a name. Likewise, the argument might not make sense if a foreclosure bank error doesn’t really cost you. More serious violations will receive a more serious response from the court.

The confiscated party cannot prove this loan (“Lost” position)

Only the debtor (the debtor or anyone acting on behalf of the owner) can give. If the confiscating party fails to own the debt, it will not “stand up” to stay. Banks sometimes have trouble issuing fees to prove their credit holders. In most cases, the loan is sold to different banks and invested, sometimes repeatedly. If the debt is consolidated and secured, it may be even more difficult to determine who owns the lien. Even in cases where the original mark is available, approvals are sometimes incorrect, or the job is missing. At present, banks and investors are careful to address paperwork gaps before market foreclosure begins. In addition, courts throughout the country have heard many court cases, and several cases have been ruled against landlords. It is increasingly difficult to win your case in constant discussion, although your case may be an exception.


The mortgage service made a serious mistake.

Mortgage managers often make the mistake of dealing with borrowers and their accounts. You can challenge blocking access based on errors such as:

  • Credit your payments to the wrong party (so you don’t actually default as stated)
  • Dual scrutiny (also awaiting foreclosure, waiting for the loan modification or other evasion option, such as a short sale or an action instead of foreclosure) in violation of federal or state law
  • impose disproportionate fees or charges that the mortgage agreement does not allow, or
  • Basically, overestimate the amount of money you have to pay to renew your mortgage.

Particularly serious are errors in the amount of money you have to pay to extend your mortgage. An excessive amount can deprive you of an important drug that allows you to maintain your home. For example, let’s say a mortgage owner claims that you owe $ 4,500 of repair money when in fact, you only owe $ 3,000 (perhaps because it requires disproportionate or disproportionate costs and fees deserve). In this situation, you may not be able to use restore. Let’s say you can pay $ 3,000, but not $ 4,500. You are a service member on active duty protected by the Service Member Civil Assistance Act. If you are serving in the military, the Civil Relief Act (SCRA) will provide you with special protection. Most importantly, if you make a pre-service mortgage, you can make a foreclosure in court even in your state, and unless you give up the lender, the foreclosure usually takes place outside of the court. If a soldier is mortgaged after serving in active service, SCRA also provides some seizure protection measures.

The statute of limitations has expired.

If a considerable amount of time has passed before you stop paying the mortgage and the lender begins to cancel the mortgage (or against you), the activity may violate the statute of limitations. Under appropriate circumstances, restrictions can be used as a powerful protective measure against rejection.

Written statements and defective statements

Usually, when people think of a broken statement for negative, the first thing that comes to mind is the robot signature scandal, where moneylenders file thousands of unresolved cases in negative forensic cases. However, erroneous statements similar to written statements can also be a non-judicial negation problem.

Looking for Mortgage Analysis Services

Judicial relief written statement

In the event of a negative judgment, the owner of the loan must complete a written declaration signed under oath, called an ‘affidavit’, in order to obtain a final decision on the right to redemption. A written statement usually contains the following information:

  • The number of months the homeowner is in arrears
  • The borrower owns the mortgage and the notes
  • Fee and costs for negative
  • The amount of interest due, and
  • The principal balance of the loan.

These definitions are often referred to as ‘definitions’. The statement must be true, accurate, and supported by appropriate file documentation. A person, usually a bank employee, reviews the loan documents and signs the declaration. Anyway, at least that’s how it should work.

Robosign’s mortgage crisis scandal

In 2010, it was announced that a number of large banks and service providers regularly use statements by employees who have not personally reviewed the documents to be accurate or who have knowledge of the information they have verified in these statements. So-called ‘robosigners’ signed thousands of statements each month and spent about 30 seconds on each test without ever reading or verifying the test information. The purpose of robosignning was to end the process – and the negative – as quickly as possible.

For information on foreclosure defense call us at (877) 399 2995. We offer litigation document review support, mortgage audit reports, securitization audit reports, affidavit of expert witness notarized, and more.


Obtain the facts & evidence and the litigation support you deserve today! Call or request a free consulation today!

What our clients say

  • Jennifer

Contact Us